NachtLaw, P.C. 
  • Home
  • About
    • Success Stories
  • Our Team
    • Attorneys
    • Staff
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact
Select Page

What went wrong with UIA fraud allegations?

On behalf of NachtLaw, P.C. | Feb 10, 2017 | Unemployment Benefits

The Michigan Unemployment Insurance Agency will stop collecting money from people they have accused of fraud – that means no more wage garnishments, federal and state tax refund intercepts or payment plan collections. A failed computer system known as MiDAS is blamed with ‘robofraud’ that made life even more miserable for those who lost work during the recession.

Fox 17 Problem Solvers have investigated the issues of questionable accusations for several years. The error rate caused by the computer system as reported by the UIA was 93 percent. This was after re-review of 22,427 cases (it reversed 20,965 of the computer-determined fraud cases).

Stiff penalties and tough collections tactics

The computer system was adopted in 2013. It was initially used to complete a six-year look back on claims as far back as 2007. As many as 50,000 people have been affected.

Concealing or misrepresenting eligibility information can amount to fraud. The UIA used a number of means to detect fraud including auditing employer records, interagency exchange of information and tips from the public to name a few.

When an allegation of fraud is leveled, any benefit paid must be returned. Then penalties for fraudulently collecting unemployment benefits are punitive:

  • In a rare event that overpayment was less than $500, the penalty is two times the amount paid (a $450 overpayment would lead to a $900 penalty)
  • Anything more than $500 triggers a penalty four times the amount overpaid (for example, receive $1,250 more than you should have and you would owe $5,000).

Apparently, the automated system worked so well that “excess” money in the unemployment insurance system was even shifted into the general state budget.

Fraud accusations and little ability to fight them

One Michigan man was hit with a $12,000 bill from the state after the automated fraud determination system flagged his claim. The agency continues to review determinations made between October 2013 and August 2015, but fewer than 2,600 have received refunds for assessed penalties.

After a lay off, unemployment compensation is an essential safety net. Paying the bills is difficult enough with lower unemployment benefits. The faulty computer program contributed to people losing their homes. Others pleaded guilty to crimes they had not committed.

Leaks of sensitive information

The issues with ‘robofraud’ are not the only at the UIA. Recently, it was disclosed that a glitch in the same state computer system disclosed Social Security number and names of almost two million people. Third-party payroll vendors were able to accidentally happen across this information from October 10 to January 30, when the breach was discovered.

While glitches occur and software patches have to be created, why unauthorized people were able to view the information for so long before a fix was implemented is troubling.

After a lay off and even before filing for unemployment benefits, it often is a good idea to speak with an employment attorney at NachtLaw. When a performance improvement plan had a discriminatory slant or only employees in their 50s were let go, there may be remedies available through a wrongful discharge lawsuit.

Recent Posts

  • What to do when your child gets bullied
  • Jury awards husband and wife $11.4M over workplace discrimination
  • Can an employer discriminate against overweight employees?
  • Employers continue to discriminate against breastfeeding workers
  • 4 examples of age discrimination you might not notice

Archives

  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • February 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • February 2013
  • October 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012

Categories

  • Age Discrimination
  • American values
  • Articles
  • blog
  • Business Litigation
  • Comments
  • Disability
  • Employment Law
  • Events
  • Firm News
  • Nacht Law in the News
  • Title IX
  • Unemployment Benefits

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

FindLaw Network

Don’t Hesitate

No substitute exists for sound legal counsel.

ANN ARBOR, MI

101 North Main Street, Suite 555
Ann Arbor, MI 48104

Phone: 888-312-7173

ANN ARBOR, MI MAP & DIRECTIONS

TRAVERSE CITY, MI

120 E Front St
2nd Floor Loft
Traverse City, MI 49684

Phone: 888-312-7173

TRAVERSE CITY, MI MAP & DIRECTIONS

BIRMINGHAM, MI

401 South Old Woodward Avenue, Suite 460
Birmingham, MI 48009

Phone: 888-312-7173

BIRMINGHAM, MI MAP & DIRECTIONS

TOLEDO, OH

One Seagate
Suite 685
Toledo, OH 43604

Phone: 888-312-7173

TOLEDO, OH MAP & DIRECTIONS
REVIEW US
Pay Invoice Visa Discover AM EX Law Pay
  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow

© 2019 NachtLaw, P.C.. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw, part of Thomson Reuters