NachtLaw, P.C. 
  • Home
  • About
    • Success Stories
  • Our Team
    • Attorneys
    • Staff
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact
Select Page

The Unacceptability of Bigotry

On behalf of NachtLaw, P.C. | Mar 7, 2016 | Firm News

I make it a point not to advocate for particular political positions or to take positions on questions of public policy that are not directly related to the interest of my clients, at least when I am writing in my capacity as the shareholder of a law firm. Recent events however, have led me to believe that it would be irresponsible to stay quiet in light of public discourse which seems to encourage bigotry. In these pages I do not advocate for or against a particular policy concerning immigration. However, as a law firm that fights against discrimination, I must speak out against the casual labeling of Mexican-Americans as having tendencies towards criminal conduct, by one presidential candidate.

As I understand the data, this is simply erroneous. Even if there were legitimate concerns about the character of individuals who are emigrating from Mexico or Central America, which I have never heard credible evidence to support, the way in which one presidential candidate has described these people is dangerous.

One test as to whether rhetoric is acceptable is to play a little game in which you substitute those being described with the group you belong to, or have warm-feelings towards. Then you can imagine how it would feel for all of those good people in that group that you belong to, to be associated with the negative attributes being described for the group as a whole. These are lessons we teach elementary school children. Indeed, by the time children are in middle school, they can be suspended for ethnic name calling, and this is not uncommon. One reason why we do not tolerate ethnic name calling in the workplace or in schools, is because we have decided that the free speech rights of the speaker should be reasonably limited to convey respect for the other members of that community. This is not “political correctness,” nor is this merely good manners. It goes right to the core of what this country is about.

We started out as a nation as Congregationalists in Massachusetts, Catholics in Maryland, Quakers in Pennsylvania, Presbyterians in Georgia and Baptists in Rhode Island. We became one nation by going beyond those differences and treating individuals as more than their particular ethnicity or religion. In becoming independent from the British, and in developing our strength as a great country, we would have failed if we would have allowed ourselves to remain bigoted and parochial, for we would have been divided.

The same presidential candidate has made comments about Muslims that casually suggest a tendency towards the commission of terrorist attacks. Again, this author takes no position about the merits of a particular immigration or national security policy in these pages. But the rhetoric that has been used cannot stand. It is reminiscent of that used against Japanese-Americans during WWII and German-Americans during World War I. I do not suggest that the government should be “soft” on terrorists, but it is a very dangerous path to suggest the people of a religious group have a tendency to be unpatriotic. In the years following WWII, when we could look to Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union as examples of everything we were not, such a statement by me would not have been necessary. Many Americans were broadly aware that Nazi rhetoric led to the Holocaust and that Stalin’s hatred of ethnic groups such as Ukrainians represented evils. Fortunately, we are decades past the end of the Soviet-Union, and we are more than 70 years past the end of Nazi Germany. But it is incumbent upon all of us to remember that American values lie in direct opposition to the singling out of groups of people for hatred.

Finally, this same presidential candidate has been bizarrely comfortable in belittling opponents who are women or who are disabled in a cruel, intemperate, discriminatory fashion. Women and the disabled, just like ethnic and religious groups, are human beings and deserve to be treated with dignity. It is dangerous to reduce a woman to her gender because you take issue with her words or actions. It is dangerous because this nation has a history of limiting the rights of women in the most basic of legal respects. Most American women could not vote 100 years ago. The ability of a woman to work in a profession of her choice, and to stay employed even though she got married or had children, are legal rights that have only been obtained in the past 50 years. The ability of the disabled to have a place in the community is a legal right that is only 20 years old. This law firm litigates cases to advance the rights of women, the disabled, and the rights of all ethnic religious groups including the rights of Anglo-Saxon Christians. When a popular political leader speaks with such hostility, it becomes socially acceptable to create a hostile educational environment or hostile work environment. For the past 20 years, this firm has fought to make it socially unacceptable to create such a hostile environment in the school and the workplace.

So by all means vote for whomever you want, and encourage the government to pursue whatever policies you favor. But demand civility and respect from our leaders and stand up for those who are picked on and belittled in your own community.

Recent Posts

  • What to do when your child gets bullied
  • Jury awards husband and wife $11.4M over workplace discrimination
  • Can an employer discriminate against overweight employees?
  • Employers continue to discriminate against breastfeeding workers
  • 4 examples of age discrimination you might not notice

Archives

  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • February 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • February 2013
  • October 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012

Categories

  • Age Discrimination
  • American values
  • Articles
  • blog
  • Business Litigation
  • Comments
  • Disability
  • Employment Law
  • Events
  • Firm News
  • Nacht Law in the News
  • Title IX
  • Unemployment Benefits

RSS Feed

Subscribe To This Blog’s Feed

FindLaw Network

Don’t Hesitate

No substitute exists for sound legal counsel.

ANN ARBOR, MI

101 North Main Street, Suite 555
Ann Arbor, MI 48104

Phone: 888-312-7173

ANN ARBOR, MI MAP & DIRECTIONS

TRAVERSE CITY, MI

120 E Front St
2nd Floor Loft
Traverse City, MI 49684

Phone: 888-312-7173

TRAVERSE CITY, MI MAP & DIRECTIONS

BIRMINGHAM, MI

401 South Old Woodward Avenue, Suite 460
Birmingham, MI 48009

Phone: 888-312-7173

BIRMINGHAM, MI MAP & DIRECTIONS

TOLEDO, OH

One Seagate
Suite 685
Toledo, OH 43604

Phone: 888-312-7173

TOLEDO, OH MAP & DIRECTIONS
REVIEW US
Pay Invoice Visa Discover AM EX Law Pay
  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow
  • Follow

© 2019 NachtLaw, P.C.. All Rights Reserved.

Disclaimer | Site Map | Privacy Policy | Business Development Solutions by FindLaw, part of Thomson Reuters