On April 4, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court rejected what was widely viewed as an effort to manipulate voting district lines in Texas to favor the conservative vote. In Evenwel v. Abbott, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld Texas’s existing Senate map, which attempted to equalize its voting districts based on total population rather than just the population of registered voters. The Court found that the map, which considered the total number of residents, was consistent with the principle of “one person, one vote.” In doing so, the opinion’s author, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, reminded us that, “As the Framers of the Constitution and the Fourteenth Amendment comprehended, representatives serve all residents, not just those eligible or registered to vote . . . By ensuring that each representative is subject to requests and suggestions from the same number of constituents, total-population apportionment promotes equitable and effective representation.
Good Judgment. Wise Counsel. Aggressive Representation.
- Understanding the Federal COVID-19 Private Employer Vaccination Mandate and Religious Accommodation Requests
- Can you be fined or jailed if you do not get vaccinated? What if HB 4471 passes?
- United Wholesale Mortgage in Pontiac, MI cheated workers out of overtime pay
- Can my employer fire me for not getting a COVID vaccination?
- Have You Been Misclassified as an Independent Contractor?